Page 10 - TOP 10 CONTEMPORARY ARTISTS - Volume VI
P. 10

to heal sick people (Acts 5:15). Even more mysterious, and thus   frame construction cast colored shadows of the gilded middle pillar
           left to the creator’s imagination or the imagination of the person   on the scene from both sides. We can assume that by intensive
           who ordered the painting, is the central and incontestable truth of   contemplation of the whole altar, the two shadows reminded the
           Christianity, which is written down in the gospels. When the angel   believers of the double nature of Christ and his actual presence,
           Gabriel comes to Mary in Nazareth and lets her know that she will   and the golden reflection reminded them of his divinity. The altar,
           give birth to God’s son, whom she should name Jesus, she asks him   with its plastically emphasized frame projecting the illumination of
           in astonishment: “How will this be, since I am a virgin?” To this the   the exterior of the field onto the painting field, is perhaps the best
           angel replies: “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power   example of Derrida’s parergon. When we look at the painting, the
           of the Most High will overshadow you; therefore the child to be   frame seems to be part of the wall on which it is fixed, but when
           born will be called holy - the Son of God” (Luke 1:31-35). The very   we look at the wall, it seems to be part of the painting, its surface
           origin of Christianity, the incarnation of the holy son in a human   merging with the surface of the frame (here Derrida refers to Kant’s
           womb, thus happens by overshadowing. The word overshadowing   golden Rahmen). The borders of the inside and the outside become
           was understood by the Renaissance Neo-Platonists as resembling   erased; the materiality does not divide the parergon only from the
           artistic creation: in Mary’s womb, God shall sketch and contrive   inside, but also from the outside, from the wall by which the altar
           the image of his shadow, Christ. That is also how it was explained   is placed, and gradually from all external (historical, economic,
           by the contemporary apocryphal. When Mary heard the angel’s   political, etc.) context. That is why we need to understand a work of
           greeting, Jesus entered into her through her left ear like a shadow.   art and respond to it in such a way that the perception of its interior
           In the 13th century, Jacobus de Voragine explained in his best seller   is formed with what we learn from the exteriority of the field. As
           the Golden Legend that the Holy Spirit would overshadow Mary so   regards Rimele’s work, this refers to the human understanding and
           that she would not feel any physical desire. The holy son would   perception of light and darkness which are discussed in this book.
           be hidden in the shadow in order to conceal his divine light, and
           in that very shadow he would be simultaneously recognized as a   In the perception of Rimele’s installations, the Derridean
           son of man.                                                “broadened edges” play a further decisive role. In 1992 Rimele
                                                                      anticipated this: “The core is situated in the optical position of the
           Overshadowing  became  an  allegory  of  the  mystery  of  the   central point, while the frame is outside the core and surrounds it.
           incarnation and conception without corporality, and the    The superiority of the position of the centre has been recognized in
           annunciation became one of the most frequently represented   a painting as the spot which needs to be ’emptied’, which means
           motives. When Filippo Lippi painted it around the year 1440, he   to reduce the presence of the energy inside the field of the centre.
           used the form of diptych, which was very popular in Florentine art   The so-called frame started to gain importance. The filling up of
           at the time, and thus established a concrete spatial division which   what is Outside and the emptying of what is Inside went on until
           proved that the incarnation was taking place without the actual   tension was created between the Outside and the Inside, or the
           contact of the two figures. As the light comes in from the left, it   form and power of the optical presence which I have named the
           reflects the angel’s shadow on the floor, which testifies that the   state of the frequency of the relation.” When Rimele transferred his
           angel is not a bodiless apparition but a real being. Yet the angel’s   experience from the painting to its spatial installations, he “started
           shadow does not fall on Mary, for it does not reach the right wing of   to emphasise the edges, so that the centre or frontal side of the
           the diptych. The painter consistently followed the words that Mary   painting started to empty itself /…/. The images of my paintings
           would be overshadowed by God, and so the invisible light source   are in fact reflections. We could say that this is an exhibition of the
           casts Mary’s shadow upon the wall behind her. Lippi’s diptych is   backs of paintings. /…/ The light illuminates the frontal parts which
           also interesting in relation to Rimele’s installations with respect to   are barely visible. The light blinds us and we experience discomfort
           its meaning and form. It is very small (64x46 cm), which testifies   faced with emptiness. Then we notice the shadows and see their
           that it was created for a small chapel or a niche in a private house,   beauty and fragility caused by their constant changing. The light
           where it was intended only for the prayer and meditation of the   is there in order to generate shadows. The shadow has always
           owner and his family. Both wings were probably divided by a pillar   been connected with darkness. That is why I find it interesting to
           already at the time of its creation, while the existing pillar frame   communicate by means of paintings which acquire their colour
           is of younger origin. The pillar between the angel and Mary in the   identity through shadow.”
           scenes of announcement is ordinary and symbolically announces
           that, during the whipping to be followed by the crucifixion, Christ,   Rimele’s consistent interest in the shadow adds numerous other
           whose conception we are witnessing, will be attached to it. The   symbolic and narrative values to his installations. The ancient
           semantic meaning of the pillar is completed by the semiotic   mythological story about the origin of the art of painting, which is
           meaning: besides dividing the two wings, it is also an element of   said to be the drawing of the silhouette of the shadow of a beloved
           apparent or real space which enters into the illusionistic scene.   person’s contours, had later many varieties and interpretations.
           Fra Angelico’s fresco from 1445 of Mary with child, surrounded   They all focused on the fact that love or perhaps desire encouraged
           by eight saints, proves that the exchange of different perceptual   the depiction of the silhouette of the departing person in order to
           levels of concrete and painted reality is possible). The author   preserve his eternal presence, not only when he would no longer
           painted plastic pillars so that they would appear to be real and   be there, but also when he would no longer be alive. That is why
           more like the pillars of Michelozzo’s monastery architecture for   it is no wonder that, aside from the red shadows which are cast
           which the painting was made. He emphasised their volume with   by Rimele’s images, Marjeta Ciglenecki also draws attention to the
           such distinctive shadows of capitals that they draw the observers’   colour symbolism of the “unbridled passion and sacrifice, for red is
           attention right away, even more so because on the left they are   the colour of initiation. It has the value of sacrament /…/ The red
           illuminated through the real window in the hall. That is why the   shadow on the wall united the left and the right parts of diptychs
           fresco Sacra conversazione came to be called Madonna of the   into indivisible wholes, but it was also a kind of passionate red
           Shadows soon after it was created.                         slit, which suggested the dematerialisation of the wall and the
                                                                      possibility of the penetration of our gaze”.
           If we come back to the reproduction of Lippi’s Annunciation, we
           can notice that the photographer has illuminated it from both the   Let us dwell a little longer on the shape of the diptych, which has
           left and right sides in the same way it was probably illuminated   a symbolic value in history, particularly in the case of wing altars,
           through windows on both sides as well as by candles in the altar   where the closed folding wings create tension before opening,
           niche of the private place for which it was created. Thus the whole   before the festive, sacramental luxury of the interior is revealed
   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15